A land surveyor from the perspective of an eight-year-old |
How do we
evaluate progress in our children? Whether we are measuring academic progress,
spiritual progress, progress in their chores, progress in their sibling/social
interaction, how do we surmise that they have gone from a position of relative
immaturity in an area to a place of more maturity? I am not a trained
educational expert, nor am I a child psychologist, nor am I a pastor or
certified counselor, but I am a land surveyor. I am a professional measurer.
People pay me to measure their real estate to a very high degree of precision,
culminated by a rubber stamp on a plat by which I stake my livelihood on the
fact that I’m right.
I am also a
father—have been for 15 years. I never finished college, but I’m working very
hard on my PhDad. By God’s grace we’ll graduate these six young people into
godly adulthood.
So, I’ve
been thinking lately that measuring our children’s growth is a lot like
measuring land (and also a lot different, but work with me here.) What many
people don’t know, or at least don’t think about very often, is that the
boundaries of a piece of property can never be measured any more precisely than
the instruments used to measure it, combined with the ability of a surveyor to
use those instruments well. On top of all this is the fact that land surveyors
are human. This is not to say that they’ll make mistakes, although that will
happen; this is to say that a surveyor can only measure as precisely as a
surveyor can see, hear, touch, and reason, i.e., surveyors are limited by the reality that they are
finite beings.
For example,
someone may say, “My deed says I own 100 feet of road frontage, and, by golly,
I want my 100 feet—no more, no less.” What the poor land owner doesn’t realize
is that there is no way for a human to measure EXACTLY 100 feet. Exactly 100
feet would mean not 100.01 feet, nor 99.99 feet. It would also mean, not
100.001 feet, nor 99.999 feet. It would also mean, not 100.0001 feet nor
99.9999 feet. Do you see what I’m getting at? No man or woman can measure
100.00000000000000000000000000…ad infinitum feet. It is impossible. Those significant
figures you learned about in 9th grade Physical Science actually do
have a “real world” application. By Tennessee Statute, I am required to certify
to the hundredth place, but in all honesty, 100.02 feet or 99.98 feet is highly
likely to actually be the measurement for a distance that I certified as being
100.00 feet. There is simply no human way to avoid it.
What does
this have to child-rearing? A child is not a distance in a deed, and the tools
for measuring are neither analog nor electronic, therefore no one can measure a
child’s progress who does not know that particular child. A child is a person,
created in the image of the triune God of heaven and earth. Outward growth, in
height or in shoe size, can be measured to about the same degree of accuracy as
a piece of land, but what about the rest of them? They are every bit as much spiritual
beings as they are material beings, created in the very image of their Creator.
Therefore, the Creator’s very own nature—revealed in His creation, in His Book,
and in His Son—is the only possible standard for fully measuring those who bear
his image. The standard for measurement is more than material, and the progress
to be measured is more than material. The fruits to be measured are words and attitudes
and actions.
Standardized
testing would be an example of measuring children like you would measure land. If
the goal of child-rearing is a 36 on the ACT, which is a fine goal in and of
itself, don’t get me wrong, then at the end of the test you can check that particular
box a “pass” or a ”fail,” but kids don’t come with pass/fail boxes, at least
not in the long run. They can fail a math test; they can fail a Latin quiz, but
not by getting less than a certain percentage right. That percentage is
arbitrary. It is an assigned value; it is not the whole story.
If your
child gets 9 out of 10 correct, then the grade of 90% on a quiz is actually
90.000000000000000...%, which is even more accurate than land surveying, but
the child is more complex than that one test. The child is more beautifully
complex than all the tests from K-4 through their PhD could ever hope to
evaluate. A gifted student could simply do their homework and score 100% on
many Saxon math tests, and to the contrary, a student who struggles with math
could study for hours and only get half of them correct. A percentile cannot
measure diligence because it cannot measure the heart nor can it measure the
effort that went into that percentage.
In
surveying, my equipment can only measure to the level of precision inherent within
the design, even if I use it perfectly. In life, your child’s progress can
never be totally encapsulated in a percentage point, which may be totally
accurate but will never tell the whole story. Our children are so much more
than “test-takers,” albeit that is one of their jobs, and we will never be
perfect “child surveyors,” although that is one of our jobs. They are finite, moreover
sinful, image-bearers of God, and we are finite, moreover sinful, image-bearers
of God. In Christ, they are not condemned for failing a test, and in Christ, we
are not condemned for testing inaccurately. If He had wanted us to run like
cogs in a machine, He would’ve made us cogs in a machine. Instead, He made us
people, so the limitations inherent within the design are the limitations we
have to work with.
Sometimes in
land surveying we run across what we call a “paper survey.” This is a survey
that reveals to a high level of certainty that the certifying surveyor of a
particular plat never cast his eyes on the subject property, much less set foot
on it to take an actual measurement. There are several ways to guess this is
the case, but without going into details here, I want to make an application to
child rearing: we need to be careful to avoid “paper surveys” of our children’s
progress. In other words, in order to know if they’ve progressed, we have to
have attended unto them personally in great detail for a long while. We have to
set foot on the property. We have to be there to measure. We have to know where
they’ve started in order to know how far they’ve come toward their goal. A
measurement cannot be taken if a line (or a ray) does not have a starting
point. We must know our child’s individual starting point if we are ever to
know if they’ve made progress.
This was made
clear to me just a couple of days ago. On Wednesday, I reviewed my son’s “phonogram”
flash cards with him. He got most of them right, but not all. On Friday morning,
he came to the breakfast table with face all aglow, a smile from ear to ear,
and good news to tell me. He reported to me that he had gotten two more of his
flash cards mastered during school on Thursday. This is memorable for me
because this is the first time he has ever come to me with “academic news” from
the previous day. What changed? Why did he have news to tell me? Why was he
grinning?
What changed? I had worked with him personally on
Wednesday. I thereby had my “starting point” from which to measure. I had a
starting point; he had a starting point, and he KNEW it.
Why did he have news to tell me? Because news isn’t news unless
something’s changed. The status quo has to change in order for anyone to care
what the news anchorman is saying. My son’s academic progress had become news
between us because I knew the status quo from Wednesday, and he knew that it
had changed on Thursday.
Why was he grinning from ear to ear? Because he knew I cared about his
education. I had taken the time on Wednesday to show that I cared by reviewing
his flash cards with him. He knew that I cared, and he knew that I would be
pleased that he had made progress. Without the starting point, there could have
been no measurement. Without the flash card review, there would have been no
news report for me on Friday and certainly no grins for papa caused by academic
progress.
If we, as
dads, can make the time to be directly involved in our children’s education,
there will be farther-reaching progress than higher grades on spelling quizzes.
For that matter, there will be higher gains than a PhD from Harvard Law. God
designed children to be nurtured by their parents. God designed little boys and
little girls (and big boys and big girls) to want to tell their dads how well
they’ve done. We are designed to do this together. If we are absent, then it
doesn’t matter how much we may say we believe in “intelligent design,” we will have
denied that design at its core. As surely as a land surveyor cannot measure a
deed distance without being present on the property, we cannot measure their
academic progress without being there…on the ground…in the fight, and we cannot
minister to their eternal needs of love and sanctification if we are not there
in their lives…on the ground…in the fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment